Methodology
Grading criteria

Each award category uses tailored and weighted criteria. Applications are evaluated and graded by our independent panel of judges on a 5-point scale. 

The scale considers relevance, clarity, and the demonstration of excellence within the criterion and is defined as follows:

 

5

Outstanding: Fully answers the question, is clear, and demonstrates excellence and best-in-class achievement for the criterion.

4

Strong: Clearly answers the question and shows above-average achievement, though may lack the exceptional distinction of a 5.

3

Satisfactory: Addresses the question and is relevant to the award, but may be missing depth, specific examples, or clear evidence of strong achievement.

2

Limited: Provides a basic or partial response with some relevant information, but would benefit from more detail, examples, or clearer alignment with the award criteria.

1

Insufficient: Offers limited information or clarity and does not demonstrate alignment with the award criteria or evidence of achievement.

Crafting a winning entry

To achieve your highest possible score, your entry should:

  1. Highlight your standout accomplishments: Focus on your most meaningful successes and the results they delivered.
  2. Clarity: Be clear, concise to ensure your entry is easy to read and understand.
  3. Provide supporting evidence: Support your entry with relevant data, real-world examples, or testimonials.